Our new tennis stats site is live!

WTA/Rome WTA/1/32-finals

Cocciaretto's clay rhythm tests Navarro's higher ranking

Analysis by Predict Tennis

Note: Written by humans, with the help of AI. Based on real statistical data.

Published: May 7, 2026(..)

Emma Navarro faces Elisabetta Cocciaretto in the Rome WTA 1/32-finals on 8 May, with clay conditions and a best-of-three format setting a clear early test.

Navarro owns the slightly higher ranking, but the numbers around recent form and market pricing lean the other way. Cocciaretto arrives with the stronger clay evidence, while their past meetings suggest the gap may not be wide.

FINISHED

Navarro E.

0
2

Cocciaretto E.

3-6

, 3-6

Shared rivalry leaves little separation

The previous two meetings are split 1-1, and the total games are level at 24 apiece. Navarro won their latest match 2-1 at the Australian Open in January 2024, but there is no clay meeting to anchor the comparison here.

That makes the rivalry useful, but not decisive. Both held 75% of service games across those meetings, although Cocciaretto created slightly better break-point conversion at 38% to Navarro's 30%.

Navarro E.

Cocciaretto E.

Wins
1 1
First Serve Points Won
70 %59 %
Second Serve Points Won
44 %55 %
Return Points Won
42 %38 %
Break Points Converted
30 %38 %
Break Points Saved
63 %70 %

Cocciaretto brings the clay evidence

Cocciaretto has a 3-3 clay record this season, with 69% of service games held and 40% of return games won. Those figures matter because they show she is already producing balanced clay-court numbers on both sides of the ball.

Navarro has no listed clay-season record in the supplied data, so the broader season view carries more weight for her. Overall, she is 4-9, with a 68% service hold rate and 31% of return games won.

Recent form favours the Italian

The last-10 picture is sharper for Cocciaretto, who stands at 5-5 compared with Navarro's 2-8. It is not just the wins. Cocciaretto has taken the first set in 70% of those matches, while Navarro is at 30%.

The return gap is also clear. Cocciaretto has broken in 40% of return games across that recent sample, against Navarro's 28%, giving her a more reliable route into service games.

Market confidence follows Cocciaretto

Bookmakers price Navarro at 2.2 against Cocciaretto at 1.67, with first-set prices of 2.1 and 1.73 respectively. That lines up with the recent-form trend rather than the ranking order.

Navarro E.

Cocciaretto E.

Win Percentage
20 %60 %
Aces per match
2.5 1.9
Double Faults per match
4.5 3.4
First Serve Points Won
65 %65 %
Second Serve Points Won
47 %48 %
Return Points Won
40 %45 %
Break Points Converted
48 %27 %
Break Points Saved
46 %67 %

Our new tennis stats site is live!

Return pressure could settle the balance

Navarro's ranking keeps this from looking one-sided, and the head-to-head record is too even to ignore. Still, Cocciaretto's current return numbers, first-set trend and clay activity give her the stronger practical case.

Workload does not create a major split. Navarro has spent 8 hours 19 minutes on court across her last five matches, while Cocciaretto is at 7 hours 46 minutes, with no back-to-back flag for either player.

Prediction

Rome WTAPICK

Elisabetta Cocciaretto

62%
Predicted Winner

Emma Navarro

The data leans towards Cocciaretto because the market view, recent form and clay-court evidence all support her case. Navarro's higher ranking and balanced rivalry record keep the margin modest, but Cocciaretto's stronger return numbers and first-set trend make her the clearer pick.

Odds

Odds:

To Win Match

Total Games

21.5

Looking for data?

Check form, surface stats for current and past seasons.

Compare H2H form, detailed H2H stats & match history.

ATP Rankings

Full List
  • 1Jannik Sinner
    14750
  • 2Carlos Alcaraz
    11960
  • 3Alexander Zverev
    5705
  • 4Novak Djokovic
    4460
  • 5Ben Shelton
    4070
  • 6Felix Auger-Aliassime
    4050
  • 7Alex de Minaur
    3855
  • 8Daniil Medvedev
    3760
  • 9Taylor Fritz
    3720
  • 10Alexander Bublik
    3320

WTA Rankings

Full List
  • 1Aryna Sabalenka
    9090
  • 2Elena Rybakina
    8143
  • 3Iga Swiatek
    6733
  • 4Jessica Pegula
    6056
  • 5Amanda Anisimova
    5848
  • 6Mirra Andreeva
    5751
  • 7Coco Gauff
    4879
  • 8Elina Svitolina
    4315
  • 9Victoria Mboko
    3670
  • 10Karolina Muchova
    3438